I am stealing this intro from a post by David Duke:Peace activist Mark Green and Professor Kevin MacDonald discuss the devastating impact Jewish intellectual movements have had on White Western societies. If you have never been able to read Dr. MacDonald’s scholarly books this 57 minute truthpackage is probably the next best thing for helping one to understand the Zionist Network’s many negative effects over our lives. Topics covered include Freudian psychology, Boasian anthropology, Marxism, the Frankfurt School, the New York intellectuals, NeoConservatism and much more...
1 of 6
2 of 6
3 of 6
4 of 6
5 of 6
6 of 6
23 comments:
Ignatius Reilly wrote in Amazon the review “The elephant otherwise unnoticed and unremarked upon”:
“To read this intellectually intoxicating book is suddenly to realize how unfree public discourse in 21st Century America really is.
MacDonald's argument is compelling and, in its broad outline, rather obvious. It is serious and brilliantly illuminating. It is in no way hateful or racist. But MacDonald says things that you just don't hear said, that never appear in our famously free media. MacDonald is a real hero for so boldly describing this elephant in the modern intellectual history of the West, an elephant that stands otherwise unnoticed and unremarked upon.”
Another high-ranked reviewer of MacDonald’s book wrote:
“His eye-opening discussion of the motivation of the Jews in their relentless campaign to change American immigration laws in 1965 provides an important insight to the present mania for multiculturalism. His convincing argument is that Jews feel safer in a society in which they are only one of several competing minority groups, within a weakened European culture. The effect of this change in the law in the US is enormous, and MacDonald is correct in claiming that the National Jewish organizations continue in their efforts to effect a fundamental change in American society. And he rightfully exposes their hypocritical defense of Israel's immigration policies, which are hardly driven by a concern for greater diversity within their own land.
This book, while not quite a call to arms, is certainly a courageous call to wake-up!”
Chechar - there is a chance you are partially Jewish (ethnically) since you live in Spain.
Scientists did mass-genetic testing of many Spaniards and found that a significant portion of them had partial Jewish ancestry.
- http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE4B45II20081205 - "From the 15th century on, Spain's Jews were mostly expelled or forced to convert, but today some 20 percent of Spanish men tested have Sephardic Jewish ancestry, and 11 percent can be traced to North Africa, a study has found."
I will ask my uncle, who has traced the family genealogy of our forefathers back to the XVI century. Frankly: I don’t care if it turns I’ve Jewish blood that far. What’s important is to defend WASP, Germanic and the Anglo-Saxon people (the ones mostly under attack by today’s elites in the West).
"From the 15th century on, Spain's Jews were mostly expelled or forced to convert, but today some 20 percent of Spanish men tested have Sephardic Jewish ancestry, and 11 percent can be traced to North Africa, a study has found."
Also, Jews (along with Muslims, of course) were allowed to be polygamous under the Caliphate -- as well as have concubines. See one of the benefits of polygamy?! The Jews & Muslims of those days did a sort-of Ghengis Khan on Spain (& Portugal). ;-)
WOW! STOP!
While I've enjoyed reading some of this recent discussion in this blog, I must cry for a stop in the nonesense.
I don't care if Chechar just wants to integrate in America leaving is Spaniard and Mexican background in the floor. However, I see in his White Nationalist policy a severe attack on Western Culture.
Europe was built arround many peoples and cultures, I will not suck up to the Anglo-Germanics... Currently, the ones who are more under attack are exactly the whiter, more un-PC ones: The Slavs, and especially the still strong Russians.
Europe is about them as well.
And I am here to defend the Latin and Hispanic peoples Chechar seem not to mind to throw under the bus. Chechar, that I am all for the Anglo-Germanic lines was disgusting. Especially coming from an Hispanic.
Meanwhile, I can cope with the white trash on here like Zsidosas and Eileen because I know that many whites cannot rise themselves any higher than non whites or positively contribute to their European culture. Therefore, the only way they can find peace and somewhat valorise themselves is to be for the great White Race and thus, White Nationalists. This will make them feel better while sitting on the trailer park. I understand that, and I symphatise because you at least, unlike most liberals, can find something great to bend to, although not contributing much.
But what I can't let these people do is to let them spread lines. So, I thoroughly forbid you from saying in this, or other blogs that praise the truth:
1) That true Hispanics are 20% Jewish.
2) That Jews in Hispania during the Reconquista were polygamous.
3) That Jews or Muslims or who ever have "Gengis Khaned" Hispania.
I forbid you because that is not the truth and you know it is not the truth, otherwise you would present some sources for your white-trash impotency and powerless derived nonesense.
Concerning the Reuters source, that source only shows the existance of the study, not the study itself which has been refuted countless times.
I don’t care about “Hispanics” in the USA (newspeak for mestizos) even though I have lived among them. I care about the race that I am in love with and are committing ethnic suicide because of liberalism (much of it caused by the Jewish activists).
Yes. I was born in Mexico. There are crimes that the Mexican Amerindians committed for three thousand years that are not being accounted for in today’s academia or MSM. And I believe that present-day Indian-mestizo culture is understandable under the light of those crimes. Unfortunately, since I was prevented from further publishing more chapters of my Quetzalcoatl at GoV (for reasons totally unrelated to the book’s content) there’s only a single published chapter there that approaches the issue.
On the other hand, since I am a newbie in MacDonald and socio-biological studies, I’ll leave to others to respond to what you say about him.
When I refer to Hispanics, I am naturally referring to whites: From Spain and Portugal.
Hispanics is an erraneous term as it is used in America.
And meanwhile, I did not speak about McDonald.
I just think that attitude of yours of to be too much pro-Anglo, to the extent that you seem you want to be one of them. And I think there's no reason for that. One thing is to be Anglophile, I consider myself to be an Anglophile, another thing is to want to be an Anglo.
That seems so silly... at least to me. I think you should defend a little more your Spanish heritage. Meanwhile, if you don't mind me asking, what's the white percentage in Mexico? 2%? 10%? 20%? I believe the most correct estimate to be 9 or 10% but, what do you say?
When you wrote above about the “Reuters source” I thought you were talking about something said in the videos. And when you said “stop that nonsense” I didn’t know what you were talking about.
I cannot be an Anglo for obvious biological reasons (my genes come from a place between Spain and France). What I defend is a specific phenotype. And that’s my own business, not to be meddled with.
Yes whites are a minority here. But I don’t know the stats. People are whiter at the north of Mexico and more Indian at the south.
I don’t identify with any of them anyway. “Tell me which music/film/writer is your favorite and I will tell you who you are”. Since I was four years old I liked Stravinsky; since I was ten years old my favorite film has been 2001; as a teen I liked Aryan nymphets (yes: there are pure Germans in Mexico); in my early twenties I had some of Arthur C. Clarke’s novels as my dream world for the future of the adolescent nymphs. But as I said, that’s my own business NOT TO BE MEDDLED WITH.
Chechar's identification with Americans, Britons, and Germans is more natural than worshipping non-Whites.
I had some of Arthur C. Clarke’s novels as my dream world for the future of the adolescent nymphs
Childhood's End?
Yes. When I discovered Maxfield Parrish’s paintings about nymphs on the rocks they rocketed my mind into the best of Clarke’s worlds: Childhood’s End, my favorite; and also The City and the Stars and later The Songs of Distant Earth. In fact, I corresponded with Clarke a bit. I still have his letters, some of them with his longhand on the envelope from Sri Lanka.
"I don’t identify with any of them anyway. “Tell me which music/film/writer is your favorite and I will tell you who you are”. Since I was four years old I liked Stravinsky; since I was ten years old my favorite film has been 2001; as a teen I liked Aryan nymphets (yes: there are pure Germans in Mexico); in my early twenties I had some of Arthur C. Clarke’s novels as my dream world for the future of the adolescent nymphs. But as I said, that’s my own business NOT TO BE MEDDLED WITH."
Why I am against it, and I don't believe it is just your own business:
You are lucky for being white. Imagine you were a brown Mexican.
I think this will suffice for your reflexion, my friend.
(P.S. - I do not care if you are more interested in blonde women or whathever. I also like blondes.
If you only like Valquírias, I'll leave you this link http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moura_encantada I bet you can somewhat read about Western Hispanic Nymphs. They also exist, for instance in Spain, known as "Janas".
If you want, I can give you more literature on the subject. But I'd only like you to think about my permiss outside the parenthesis.
That's what sucks about White Nationalism American style: It dilutes [destroys] the differences between Europeans which are what has made Europe - and America - great.
Of course I hope you integrate in the United States, and get te most beautifull of the american girls, but it is your thinking that I find somewhat incorrect and am asking for you to stop a little, and think about it.)
---------
Besides, great news that whites are a minority in Mexico (sarcasm), I truuuuly didn't know that...
I don’t only like Nordic women. Recently I spent a year in Spain and I did see some very cute nymphs there (but not as many as I saw in Houston, where I lived more time). And I am not in America and therefore cannot be criticized that “WN sucks” etc (when I lived in America I was not concerned about WN issues). However, I believe that, for example, BNP has a point in stating that in Britain racialism has to be focused in British culture and Anglo-Saxon/Celtic/Scot ethnicity.
@ “it is your thinking that I find somewhat incorrect and am asking for you to stop a little, and think about it”
You don’t know my thinking; e.g., didn’t even know that I am not in the U.S. And I won’t stop, “my friend” (Auster has asked me exactly the same, that I stop blogging, yesterday in his blogsite).
Clarke foresaw racial discrimination against Whites in S. Africa. As you may recall in his book the Overlords had to step in to stop it via fairly drastic means.
He was also very interested in the paranormal in real life, feeling it was an untapped science. He reflected those same thoughts in his written work.
Did you get any additional insights from your correspondence with him?
Not much actually. But in the 1990 Pan Books Foreword of Childhood’s End he did say:
‘When this book was written in the early 1950s, I was still very impressed by the evidence for what is generally called the paranormal... Four decades later, after spending some millions of dollars of Yorkshire Television’s money... I am an almost total sceptic... When Childhood’s End first appeared, many readers were baffled by a statement after the title page to the effect that “The opinions expressed in this book are not those of the author”... Today I would like to change that target of the disclaimer to cover 99 per cent of the paranormal... and 100 per cent of UFO “encounters”’.
With the “Residue fallacy” Robert Sheaffer’s 1980 book made me see that the 1% left cannot be accounted by the paranormal hypothesis either.
By the way, I sent Clarke one issue of the Journal of the Society for Psychical Research which published one of my complex parapsychological articles. He replied he was shocked to learn (from the JSPR’s obituary page) about the death of Benson Herbert, who he knew before the war.
Still, I have a sub-page in my Wikipedia user page in honor to Clarke and Childhood’s End.
Do you have a record of your parapsychological articles or the topics you covered listed somewhere on your site?
1. “The Turin Shroud: A Case of Retrocognitive Thoughtography?” (January 1990).
2. “Will Permanent Paranormal Objects Vindicate Parapsychology?” (July 1991).
3. “Childhood’s End (book rev.) by Arthur C. Clarke” (January 1992).
4. “The New Age: Notes of a Fringe Watcher” (book rev.) by Martin Gardner (July 1992).
5. “Are the Faces of Bélmez Permanent Paranormal Objects?” (July 1993)
6. “Second Thoughts on the Turin Shroud” (January 1994).
7. “A Hundred Wolves: Essay Review of Joe Nickell’s ‘Looking for a Miracle’” (July 1994).
I investigated the Bélmez case in the little town of Bélmez, Andalusia. When I became agnostic I published another Bélmez article in Skeptical Inquirer.
P.S.
By the way, I am the main editor of this Wikipedia article on the Bélmez Faces.
P.P.S.
I took the “blurry photo” of the woman face you see at the top of the Wiki article (click on the photo if you like).
And a 1992 photo of me in the “most haunted house in Spain” (the Bélmez’s “House of the Faces) appears in the talk page.
Thanks for sharing. I had a long interest in psi, read some of the same books.
From reading the work of Dean Radin, Charles Honorton, and Jessica Utts I am satisfied that psi is a reality at a statistical level.
The skeptics will be proven wrong over time.
However it's not really the topic of you blog - except perhaps as a shared theme of potential evolution and Romanticism about races - so I'll let the subject go for now.
Curiously, my JSPR articles on the Shroud are mentioned in the book by Lynn Picknett & Clive Prince, THE TURIN SHROUD: IN WHOSE IMAGE?, New York, Harper Collins, 1994 (pp. 45-46 and in passing pp. 56, 58).
Now I am embarrassed of those articles...
Your past tendency to see evidence where there is none will likely not be an aid to you, true.
Since we seem to agree about the nymphs, and agree to disagree on psi and the JQ, I am curious what do you think of the book I’ve been publishing (today I added the last chapter in this very blog)?
Post a Comment