The West’s darkest hour: Szasz and Breggin

Saturday, June 19, 2010

Szasz and Breggin

This post has been edited in 2011 and moved here:

http://eliminatedleaves.wordpress.com/2009/06/19/on-szasz-breggin-and-oaks/

1 comment:

Robert said...: Why I rejected Dr. Szasz. His book has been used as an excuse by my libertarian relatives to desert my hospitalized and tormented brother bacause his mental torments are his fault.; June 23, 2010 at 4:59:00 AM GMT+1

"That the beauty of the white aryan woman will not perish from the earth"

White Nationalism is the monstrous and immoral idea that the white race, a unique biological subspecies that is in long-term danger of extinction (due to loss of habitat and competition from hardier invasive subspecies) deserves the same protections as snail darters, spotted owls, and California condors.

Writing without sarcasm, multi-culturalism is a lie, a mask behind which our enemies have created conditions that are leading to our genocide. White Americans will become a minority in this country by 2050. A vast number of white Americans are profoundly uncomfortable with this transformation.

Terre et Peuple, Blut und Boden: The notion that every people needs its own land is absolutely essential. The white race must acquire a Homeland of its own, some place on earth where white children can be born and raised in physical and spiritual safety, and where our numbers may be restored and the threat of racial extinction overcome.

“Mightier than the tread of marching armies is the power of an idea whose time has come.” — Victor Hugo

NORTH AMERICAN NEW RIGHT (JOURNAL)

The goal of Counter-Currents and North American New Right is to create an intellectual movement analogous to the European New Right, a movement that will lay the foundations of a White Republic in North America.

But why if it is too early for politics? Specifically, it is too late to reform the system and too early to replace it. But we can promote our ideas...

At the end of every year, the best of the online journal of Counter-Currents Publishing, Ltd. will be published as a paperback volume.

"Toward the White Republic" (Sept. 2010)

“Whoever fails to see that the greatest danger to European peoples is the Western plutocracy (led often by Jews), not Slavic Communists, fails to draw the key lesson of modern history.” —Michael O'Meara

The book is available: here.

America is the cancer of the white race, and those who haven’t recognized that fact by now are probably beyond saving. All white nationalists must read this pamphlet about why secession is our only hope. Like an ole country boy said the other day, “it’s too late to vote the bastards out, and too early to start shooting them.” (Click on the image to read the book’s first chapter: an extremely powerful article; my short comment on it appears here).

A casual comment from a former American

Conservatives and Liberals vested in the judaeo-economic system are quick to pooh-pooh the idea of secession due to its difficulties and history of failure. What they fail to include in that history are the successes that overcame the difficulties of time and place. Nearly every country on the face of this planet was brought into existence by secession from empire or nation.

Despite years as a mercenary in American service I have learned that the Republic of my ancestors no longer exists. The blinders have gone. The entity calling itself “The United States of America” is not my nation. Those among its citizens who wish to preserve the Beast are not my people. It does not matter that many are “racial kinsmen.” Any man who would force my posterity to suffer the “joy of diversity” to preserve his power, privilege, or comfort is my enemy.

I cannot “lose” what is not mine. I would gladly “lose 95%” of the Beast if my posterity’s existence for the next several centuries could be secured with the remaining 5%. This attitude I hold in common with secessionists from the British Empire, nearly 250 years ago.

Today the greatest sin is “racism,” and the worst form of racism is “Anti-Semitism.” Most people in the US/Canada or Western Europe today have an almost hysterical religious fanaticism about “racism” being evil.

But the whole concept of racism was unknown 100 years ago.

Cui bono?

It’s clear that the values promoted today benefit one ethnic group above all else. This ethnic group also owns practically all the mainstream media outlets (newspapers and TV networks), the publishing companies, the education establishment, the practice of law, etc.

It is no mystery why this ethnic group promotes a sick morality of white suicide. As Sailer wrote recently, they are motivated by atavistic rage and dread of whites as “The Other.”

(A casual comment in the blogosphere)

Untimely Ideas

“INTERREGNUM: The period between the end of one civilization and the possible birth of another. We are currently living through an interregnum, a tragic historical moment when everything is in flames and when everything, like a Phoenix, might rise reborn from its ashes. ETHNIC CIVIL WAR: Only the outbreak of such a war will resolve the problems created by the current colonization, Africanization, and Islamization of Europe. Only with their backs to the wall is a people spurred to come up with solutions that in other times would be unthinkable. REVOLUTION: We have long passed the point of no return, where it is possible to arrest the prevailing decay with moderate political reforms...”

Undermining Moral Authority: The mass murder of 6 million Jews is so important the whole world must steep itself in permanent mourning but the mass murder of 30 million non-Jews is not even worthy of a footnote? If only the Bolshevik holocaust was taught in the schools and if only the Bolshevik holocaust had memorials in every town and if only the Bolshevik holocaust had hundreds of films about it what would the Jews say? I think they’d say it implied the lives of Jews had no value. While the Bolshevik holocaust is denied the holocult implies the lives of non-Jews have no value. (And if you want to win an argument with the official version over the actual details of what happened then the best way is to demolish their moral authority first.)

Derailing Narrative: Nazis as a monstrous reason-less eruption out of the inherently black Aryan soul that needs to be bred out of existence by diversity or Nazis as reaction to a hostile expansionist Bolshevik state that had recently invented industrial mass murder, practised it on millions of its own citizens and had a powerful fifth column inside Germany. Which is the most useful narrative from their point of view?

Paradigm shift

Counter-jihadists originally helped me to understand the suicide of the West. I have since moved on from philosemitism to concentrate on the ultimate goal: Euro-white preservation. As Count Clermont-Tonnerre expressed it in addressing the French National Assembly in 1789, “The Jews should be denied everything as a nation, but granted everything as individuals. The existence of a nation within a nation is unacceptable to our country.” Americans and Europeans ought to take heed to what the Count said in 1789. (Cf. these two pieces by Kevin MacDonald: “Introducing The Occidental Observer” and “Remaking the Right”.)

Stalin’s Jews

The Nazis are always discussed in a vacuum. There’s never any mention of the mass murder by Lenin and Stalin and their Jews.

Stalin’s Jews: We mustn’t forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish.

An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name “Genrikh Yagoda,” the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU’s deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin’s collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system. —Desmond Jones

A classic: “The Turner Diaries” by W.L. Pierce

Excerpts from “Mars & Hephaestus: The Return of History” by Guillaume Faye

The twenty-first century will be a century of iron and storms. It will not resemble those harmonious futures predicted up to the 1970s. It will not be the global village prophesied by Marshall MacLuhan in 1966, or Bill Gates’ planetary network, or Francis Fukuyama’s end of history: a liberal global civilization directed by a universal state. The Third Age of European Civilization commences, in a tragic acceleration of the historical process, with the Treaty of Versailles and end of the civil war of 1914-18: the catastrophic twentieth century. Four generations were enough to undo the labor of more than forty. Europe fell victim to its own tragic Prometheanism, its own opening to the world and universalism, oblivious of all ethnic solidarity.  The Fourth Age of European civilization begins today. It will be the Age of rebirth or perdition. The twenty-first century will be for this civilization, the fateful century, the century of life or death.  Let us cultivate the pessimistic optimism of Nietzsche. “There is no more order to conserve; it is necessary to create a new one.” Will the beginning of the twenty-first century be difficult? Are all the indicators in the red? So much the better. They predicted the end of history after the collapse of the USSR? We wish to speed its return: thunderous, bellicose, and archaic. Islam resumes its wars of conquest. China and India wish to become superpowers. And so forth. The twenty-first century will be placed under the double sign of Mars, the god of war, and of Hephaestus, the god who forges swords, the master of technology and the chthonic fires. This century will be that of the metamorphic rebirth of Europe, like the Phoenix, or of its disappearance as a historical civilization and its transformation into a cosmopolitan and sterile Luna Park.  The beginning of twenty-first century will be the despairing midnight of the world of which Hölderlin spoke. But it is always darkest before the dawn. Let us prepare our children for war. Let us educate our youth, be it only a minority, as a new aristocracy.  Today we need more than morality. We need hypermorality, the Nietzschean ethics of difficult times. When one defends one’s people, i.e., one’s own children, one defends the essential. Then one follows the rule of Agamemnon and Leonidas but also of Charles Martel: what prevails is the law of the sword, whose bronze or steel reflects the glare of the sun.

The West’s darkest hour

Saturday, June 19, 2010

Szasz and Breggin

1 comment:

My blog list:

"That the beauty of the white aryan woman will not perish from the earth"

Catalina...

Featured article #1

Featured article #2

NORTH AMERICAN NEW RIGHT (JOURNAL)

"Toward the White Republic" (Sept. 2010)

Four novels

Northwest front

A casual comment from a former American

FAQ Boradcast

Why I write

The works of David Irving

Popular Posts

Untimely Ideas

Guillaume Faye: "Call to young Europeans" (Click on the pic)

Radio free from Jewish control

Prof. Kevin MacDonald

MacDonald’s trilogy

Paradigm shift

If you are biased against MacDonald...

To the Tea Party:

Stalin’s Jews

From Hamlet

The other side of the story

Come Home!

A classic: “The Turner Diaries” by W.L. Pierce

A casual comment in the blogosphere...

Labels

About Me

Search This Blog

Excerpts from “Mars & Hephaestus: The Return of History” by Guillaume Faye

StatCounter

Followers

Blog Archive