All chapters of this book have been moved: here.
Wifejak: The Edgiest Meme on the Internet
8 hours ago
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Catalina...
Featured article #1
“It is the Ring, stupid!”
(click on the pic)
"Toward the White Republic" (Sept. 2010)
“Whoever fails to see that the greatest danger to European peoples is the Western plutocracy (led often by Jews), not Slavic Communists, fails to draw the key lesson of modern history.” —Michael O'Meara
The book is available: here.
America is the cancer of the white race, and those who haven’t recognized that fact by now are probably beyond saving. All white nationalists must read this pamphlet about why secession is our only hope. Like an ole country boy said the other day, “it’s too late to vote the bastards out, and too early to start shooting them.” (Click on the image to read the book’s first chapter: an extremely powerful article; my short comment on it appears here).
Four novels
“Political power is the essential criterion, not wishes or windbags; and to the goal of political power all else must be temporarily sacrificed. To say less is to insure defeat”. —Revilo P. Oliver
Harold Covington is the author of the Northwest Quartet. The image links to a book-review of the whole quartet.
Northwest front
The Northwest Quartet is the story of the creation of a sovereign white nationalist state, the Northwest American Republic. The tricolor flag pic — which means blue sky, green land and the white race at the middle — links to Covington’s website. If an ethno-state is indeed created, my dream is that in the far future its people will resemble the paradisiacal world of Maxfield Parrish:
Part of the Florentine Fete murals exhibited at the National Museum of American Illustration. Click on the pic to see the details.
FAQ Boradcast
Click on the seal.
The works of David Irving
(downloadable files)
Whatever the Germans have been accused of doing, the Japanese did worse by a factor of 2, while the Soviets did worse by a factor of 4 or 5. Yet strangely, you still see 1933-45 Germany as the ultimate evil.
Popular Posts
-
Hitler’s defeat was the defeat of Europe. And of America. How could we have been so blind? – Edmund Connelly Last February ... -
Daniel Mackler (click on the pic) is Jewish from his mother's side; plays a guitar and used to practice psycho-therapy in New York... -
“To live now and not to know this work is to be a kind of historical fool” —W.L. Webb “When do you plan to campaign for a museum honoring t... -
Western men have become brainless sheep. They bleat how they’re told. Even for those white nationalists who are beginning to awaken to the r...
Untimely Ideas
“INTERREGNUM: The period between the end of one civilization and the possible birth of another. We are currently living through an interregnum, a tragic historical moment when everything is in flames and when everything, like a Phoenix, might rise reborn from its ashes. ETHNIC CIVIL WAR: Only the outbreak of such a war will resolve the problems created by the current colonization, Africanization, and Islamization of Europe. Only with their backs to the wall is a people spurred to come up with solutions that in other times would be unthinkable. REVOLUTION: We have long passed the point of no return, where it is possible to arrest the prevailing decay with moderate political reforms...”
Guillaume Faye: "Call to young Europeans" (Click on the pic)
“Not since the fall of the Roman Empire has Europe experienced such a dramatic situation...” A Faye talk given in Moscow on May 17, 2005 (here).
Prof. Kevin MacDonald
Evolutionary psychology scholar of Judaism. (The pic links to MacDonald's website.)
MacDonald’s trilogy
The “Bible” of those conscious about the Jewish Question
Undermining Moral Authority: The mass murder of 6 million Jews is so important the whole world must steep itself in permanent mourning but the mass murder of 30 million non-Jews is not even worthy of a footnote? If only the Bolshevik holocaust was taught in the schools and if only the Bolshevik holocaust had memorials in every town and if only the Bolshevik holocaust had hundreds of films about it what would the Jews say? I think they’d say it implied the lives of Jews had no value. While the Bolshevik holocaust is denied the holocult implies the lives of non-Jews have no value. (And if you want to win an argument with the official version over the actual details of what happened then the best way is to demolish their moral authority first.)
Derailing Narrative: Nazis as a monstrous reason-less eruption out of the inherently black Aryan soul that needs to be bred out of existence by diversity or Nazis as reaction to a hostile expansionist Bolshevik state that had recently invented industrial mass murder, practised it on millions of its own citizens and had a powerful fifth column inside Germany. Which is the most useful narrative from their point of view?
If you are biased against MacDonald...
...read these passages on the Jewish Question written—by a Jew!
The other side of the story
The death of National Socialist Germany was the death of Western man and everything he once stood for (click on the pic).
Come Home!
The most distinguishing feature of the rest of the White racial resistance movement is its lack of any plan whatsoever for the actual assumption of state power.
A classic: “The Turner Diaries” by W.L. Pierce
Click on the image to listen to the whole Audio Book.
“Though conservatism cannot win against the left, a new revolutionary force, with the spiritual basis that conservatism lacks, and advancing with even more boldness and determination than the forces of the left, can win! That new revolutionary force is being built now. Its ranks are being filled with disciplined, idealistic young men and women” (excerpt from Pierce’s “Why Conservatives Can’t Win”).
A casual comment in the blogosphere...
“I grew up on the Internet and I still was blinded to Jewish influence. It’s such an incredible ‘conspiracy’, that it's not easy just to give yourself over to it, instantly. It takes a lot of research, and a ton of reading, before you finally conclude: Wow it's true.”
About Me
Excerpts from “Mars & Hephaestus: The Return of History” by Guillaume Faye
The twenty-first century will be a century of iron and storms. It will not resemble those harmonious futures predicted up to the 1970s. It will not be the global village prophesied by Marshall MacLuhan in 1966, or Bill Gates’ planetary network, or Francis Fukuyama’s end of history: a liberal global civilization directed by a universal state. The Third Age of European Civilization commences, in a tragic acceleration of the historical process, with the Treaty of Versailles and end of the civil war of 1914-18: the catastrophic twentieth century. Four generations were enough to undo the labor of more than forty. Europe fell victim to its own tragic Prometheanism, its own opening to the world and universalism, oblivious of all ethnic solidarity. The Fourth Age of European civilization begins today. It will be the Age of rebirth or perdition. The twenty-first century will be for this civilization, the fateful century, the century of life or death. Let us cultivate the pessimistic optimism of Nietzsche. “There is no more order to conserve; it is necessary to create a new one.” Will the beginning of the twenty-first century be difficult? Are all the indicators in the red? So much the better. They predicted the end of history after the collapse of the USSR? We wish to speed its return: thunderous, bellicose, and archaic. Islam resumes its wars of conquest. China and India wish to become superpowers. And so forth. The twenty-first century will be placed under the double sign of Mars, the god of war, and of Hephaestus, the god who forges swords, the master of technology and the chthonic fires. This century will be that of the metamorphic rebirth of Europe, like the Phoenix, or of its disappearance as a historical civilization and its transformation into a cosmopolitan and sterile Luna Park. The beginning of twenty-first century will be the despairing midnight of the world of which Hölderlin spoke. But it is always darkest before the dawn. Let us prepare our children for war. Let us educate our youth, be it only a minority, as a new aristocracy. Today we need more than morality. We need hypermorality, the Nietzschean ethics of difficult times. When one defends one’s people, i.e., one’s own children, one defends the essential. Then one follows the rule of Agamemnon and Leonidas but also of Charles Martel: what prevails is the law of the sword, whose bronze or steel reflects the glare of the sun.
2 comments:
> Also, deMause assumes a gradual improvement in child treatment from 460 AD to approximately 1100 AD: an impossibility if we consider that about the 8th century Europe was in its darkest ages.
But if the psychogenic theory of history is true, the brutal modes of childrearing in the Middle Ages had to be necessarily worse, given that the medieval mind lost again autonomous consciousness for more than a millennium.
* * * * *
I think you are subject to the “Enlightenment delusion”. The Middle Ages was a period of accelerated material progress. Of course, it was not the same the 8th C as the 12th,
It took Gibbon six volumes to describe the decline of Rome, in part due to the new religions that overwhelmed the empire, and I cannot embark on that. Later I'll respond to what you said in another thread about an Octavio Paz statement last month. Sorry for the long delay.
You know, both the late Paz and I were/are secular humanists. Since we fight for Western civilization some people like Oriana Fallaci would use the term “Catholic atheists”. But that still doesn’t describe me. The universe is, to my mind, quite a mystery (I am opened to a Hegelian view on God but I really hate metaphysics and prefer to be considered simply an “agnostic”).
Anyway. I would like to respond by pointing out to one of the sources mentioned in this entry: Kenneth Clark’s Civilisation.
I trust you have watched it.
After Civilisation was aired in 1969, Clark got warm congratulations from three Cardinals and other Christian conservatives. I mention this just to point out that his series is everything but a critique of Christendom. On the contrary: Clark is very fond of the Catholicism in previous centuries.
Nonetheless, in his first chapter of Civilisation, Clark states that the subject of Greco-Roman art was man. But, writing about the Early Middle Ages, he adds: “Two hundred years have passed – perhaps a little more – and man has almost vanished”. He of course is talking of “men of the Dark Ages”. A few pages later he adds:
For over five hundred years this achievement was rare in Western Europe. It is a shock to realise that during all this time no lay person, from kings and emperors downwards, could read or write... St Gregory himself is credited with having destroyed many volumes of classical literature, even whole libraries.
And on the next page Clark recognizes Charlemagne as the first great man to emerge from darkness since the collapse of Rome.
By the end of that chapter, “The Skin of out Teeth”, Clarke acknowledges that at the end of the 10th century the Church emerged as a new power in Europe. “It was a great humaniser”. These are the very last words of that chapter: “The long dominance of the barbarian wanderers was over, and Western Europe was prepared for its first great age of civilization”.
The following program of Civilisation is devoted to this awakening, starting from 1100 AD (as shown in the valid part of the graph above). Clarke criticizes aspects of the Enlightenment and Revolution later in his book/TV series.
Any fair reading from history would lead to the conclusion that there was indeed a dark period in the history of Europe, and that deMause is obviously wrong on his ever-ascending graphs.
Post a Comment