All chapters of this book have been moved: here.
Hatred of Trump is Anti-White Racism
2 hours ago
Saturday, April 03, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Catalina...
Featured article #1
“It is the Ring, stupid!”
(click on the pic)
"Toward the White Republic" (Sept. 2010)
“Whoever fails to see that the greatest danger to European peoples is the Western plutocracy (led often by Jews), not Slavic Communists, fails to draw the key lesson of modern history.” —Michael O'Meara
The book is available: here.
America is the cancer of the white race, and those who haven’t recognized that fact by now are probably beyond saving. All white nationalists must read this pamphlet about why secession is our only hope. Like an ole country boy said the other day, “it’s too late to vote the bastards out, and too early to start shooting them.” (Click on the image to read the book’s first chapter: an extremely powerful article; my short comment on it appears here).
Four novels
“Political power is the essential criterion, not wishes or windbags; and to the goal of political power all else must be temporarily sacrificed. To say less is to insure defeat”. —Revilo P. Oliver
Harold Covington is the author of the Northwest Quartet. The image links to a book-review of the whole quartet.
Northwest front
The Northwest Quartet is the story of the creation of a sovereign white nationalist state, the Northwest American Republic. The tricolor flag pic — which means blue sky, green land and the white race at the middle — links to Covington’s website. If an ethno-state is indeed created, my dream is that in the far future its people will resemble the paradisiacal world of Maxfield Parrish:
Part of the Florentine Fete murals exhibited at the National Museum of American Illustration. Click on the pic to see the details.
FAQ Boradcast
Click on the seal.
The works of David Irving
(downloadable files)
Whatever the Germans have been accused of doing, the Japanese did worse by a factor of 2, while the Soviets did worse by a factor of 4 or 5. Yet strangely, you still see 1933-45 Germany as the ultimate evil.
Popular Posts
-
Hitler’s defeat was the defeat of Europe. And of America. How could we have been so blind? – Edmund Connelly Last February ... -
Daniel Mackler (click on the pic) is Jewish from his mother's side; plays a guitar and used to practice psycho-therapy in New York... -
“To live now and not to know this work is to be a kind of historical fool” —W.L. Webb “When do you plan to campaign for a museum honoring t... -
Western men have become brainless sheep. They bleat how they’re told. Even for those white nationalists who are beginning to awaken to the r...
Untimely Ideas
“INTERREGNUM: The period between the end of one civilization and the possible birth of another. We are currently living through an interregnum, a tragic historical moment when everything is in flames and when everything, like a Phoenix, might rise reborn from its ashes. ETHNIC CIVIL WAR: Only the outbreak of such a war will resolve the problems created by the current colonization, Africanization, and Islamization of Europe. Only with their backs to the wall is a people spurred to come up with solutions that in other times would be unthinkable. REVOLUTION: We have long passed the point of no return, where it is possible to arrest the prevailing decay with moderate political reforms...”
Guillaume Faye: "Call to young Europeans" (Click on the pic)
“Not since the fall of the Roman Empire has Europe experienced such a dramatic situation...” A Faye talk given in Moscow on May 17, 2005 (here).
Prof. Kevin MacDonald
Evolutionary psychology scholar of Judaism. (The pic links to MacDonald's website.)
MacDonald’s trilogy
The “Bible” of those conscious about the Jewish Question
Undermining Moral Authority: The mass murder of 6 million Jews is so important the whole world must steep itself in permanent mourning but the mass murder of 30 million non-Jews is not even worthy of a footnote? If only the Bolshevik holocaust was taught in the schools and if only the Bolshevik holocaust had memorials in every town and if only the Bolshevik holocaust had hundreds of films about it what would the Jews say? I think they’d say it implied the lives of Jews had no value. While the Bolshevik holocaust is denied the holocult implies the lives of non-Jews have no value. (And if you want to win an argument with the official version over the actual details of what happened then the best way is to demolish their moral authority first.)
Derailing Narrative: Nazis as a monstrous reason-less eruption out of the inherently black Aryan soul that needs to be bred out of existence by diversity or Nazis as reaction to a hostile expansionist Bolshevik state that had recently invented industrial mass murder, practised it on millions of its own citizens and had a powerful fifth column inside Germany. Which is the most useful narrative from their point of view?
If you are biased against MacDonald...
...read these passages on the Jewish Question written—by a Jew!
The other side of the story
The death of National Socialist Germany was the death of Western man and everything he once stood for (click on the pic).
Come Home!
The most distinguishing feature of the rest of the White racial resistance movement is its lack of any plan whatsoever for the actual assumption of state power.
A classic: “The Turner Diaries” by W.L. Pierce
Click on the image to listen to the whole Audio Book.
“Though conservatism cannot win against the left, a new revolutionary force, with the spiritual basis that conservatism lacks, and advancing with even more boldness and determination than the forces of the left, can win! That new revolutionary force is being built now. Its ranks are being filled with disciplined, idealistic young men and women” (excerpt from Pierce’s “Why Conservatives Can’t Win”).
A casual comment in the blogosphere...
“I grew up on the Internet and I still was blinded to Jewish influence. It’s such an incredible ‘conspiracy’, that it's not easy just to give yourself over to it, instantly. It takes a lot of research, and a ton of reading, before you finally conclude: Wow it's true.”
About Me
Excerpts from “Mars & Hephaestus: The Return of History” by Guillaume Faye
The twenty-first century will be a century of iron and storms. It will not resemble those harmonious futures predicted up to the 1970s. It will not be the global village prophesied by Marshall MacLuhan in 1966, or Bill Gates’ planetary network, or Francis Fukuyama’s end of history: a liberal global civilization directed by a universal state. The Third Age of European Civilization commences, in a tragic acceleration of the historical process, with the Treaty of Versailles and end of the civil war of 1914-18: the catastrophic twentieth century. Four generations were enough to undo the labor of more than forty. Europe fell victim to its own tragic Prometheanism, its own opening to the world and universalism, oblivious of all ethnic solidarity. The Fourth Age of European civilization begins today. It will be the Age of rebirth or perdition. The twenty-first century will be for this civilization, the fateful century, the century of life or death. Let us cultivate the pessimistic optimism of Nietzsche. “There is no more order to conserve; it is necessary to create a new one.” Will the beginning of the twenty-first century be difficult? Are all the indicators in the red? So much the better. They predicted the end of history after the collapse of the USSR? We wish to speed its return: thunderous, bellicose, and archaic. Islam resumes its wars of conquest. China and India wish to become superpowers. And so forth. The twenty-first century will be placed under the double sign of Mars, the god of war, and of Hephaestus, the god who forges swords, the master of technology and the chthonic fires. This century will be that of the metamorphic rebirth of Europe, like the Phoenix, or of its disappearance as a historical civilization and its transformation into a cosmopolitan and sterile Luna Park. The beginning of twenty-first century will be the despairing midnight of the world of which Hölderlin spoke. But it is always darkest before the dawn. Let us prepare our children for war. Let us educate our youth, be it only a minority, as a new aristocracy. Today we need more than morality. We need hypermorality, the Nietzschean ethics of difficult times. When one defends one’s people, i.e., one’s own children, one defends the essential. Then one follows the rule of Agamemnon and Leonidas but also of Charles Martel: what prevails is the law of the sword, whose bronze or steel reflects the glare of the sun.
2 comments:
Today I received the following e-mail by D.J., which I’ll respond in the next post:
If I may take a few more moments of your time, it appears your book presents a case for falsification of Jaynes' theory of the bicameral mind. Recent data, in your view, supports child abuse as a prominent cause of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia produces auditory hallucinations which in some fashion is the origin of religious/spiritual voices. Infanticide, abandonment and abuse is also seen in high primates, possibly evolving, in the extreme, to deal with Malthusian collapses in primate societies. It's probably reasonable to speculate that the abuse produces psychosis in primates, which apparently manifests itself in a variety of ways. However, probably not auditory hallucinations. It probably means language is necessary even for hallucinations and thus human consciousness. Also, is there any data correlating schizophrenia with IQ?
Darwin's (and Jaynes'?) position was that thought cannot exist without language. In other words consciousness, as Jaynes describes it, cannot exist without language. Other arguments are mathematical, thought arises at a certain density of matter, emergence, as in hydrogen and oxygen become water, and bipedalism, in that the awareness of the horizon in the grasslands produced some sort of stimulus that resulted in consciousness. I have always argued in Darwin's defence, however, your view is unique and your input, when you have a moment, would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks D.J. for your comments:
@ If I may take a few more moments of your time, it appears your book presents a case for falsification of Jaynes' theory of the bicameral mind. Recent data, in your view, supports child abuse as a prominent cause of schizophrenia...
I have a whole web page on this subject. But most of it is in Spanish. And yes: falsifying Jaynes hypothesis is important, and I approached that subject in my Jaynes chapter.
@ Infanticide, abandonment and abuse is also seen in high primates, possibly evolving, in the extreme, to deal with Malthusian collapses in primate societies.
As you can see in the contents page to my book, I will approach the subject of infanticide very thoroughly (the only chapter with dozens of academic references) in a forthcoming chapter. Since infanticide has occurred in very prosperous cultures, like deMause I dismiss Malthusian explanations of it.
@ It's probably reasonable to speculate that the abuse produces psychosis in primates, which apparently manifests itself in a variety of ways. However, probably not auditory hallucinations. It probably means language is necessary even for hallucinations and thus human consciousness.
This is very interesting. There was a passage about animal infanticide in this very chapter that I decided to remove because it was a little boring... But yes: there’s research on primate infanticide going on.
@ Also, is there any data correlating schizophrenia with IQ?
Shrinks say that people with lower IQs are more vulnerable to the disorder.
@ Darwin's (and Jaynes'?) position was that thought cannot exist without language. In other words consciousness, as Jaynes describes it, cannot exist without language. […] however, your view is unique and your input, when you have a moment, would be greatly appreciated.
I believe that what Ark said about the development of empathy is true. If what I am saying is “unique” it’s because there are no other writers that presently are trying to amalgamate Miller (the subject of my 3rd book) with deMause. In fact, I have lost online friends because, although they are Miller fans, they are too cowards to stomach deMause’s psych-heavy data.
I don’t consider myself so unique. Using Wikipedia jargon I’d say that my Quetzalcoatl book is “OR by synthesis” (original research only in the sense that I am amalgamating two rather different psychohistories: Jaynes’ PH and deMause’s PH). Alternatively, it could be said that in my 4th book I try to amalgamate various models, mainly Alice Miller’s, Colin Ross’ and Lloyd deMause’s. While I found Jaynes’ book fascinating, language is not my business. My business is, in a nutshell, how child abuse causes westerners to hate their race & culture to the suicidal point. Unlike Miller, Ross and deMause, Jaynes does not focus on child abuse. Not at all.
If you like , you could try to post your reply here instead of emailing me.
Post a Comment