This article has been moved: here.
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
“That the beauty of the white Aryan women shall not perish from the earth.”
White Nationalism is the monstrous and immoral idea that the white race, a unique biological subspecies that is in long-term danger of extinction (due to loss of habitat and competition from hardier invasive subspecies) deserves the same protections as snail darters, spotted owls, and California condors.
Writing without sarcasm, multi-culturalism is a lie, a mask behind which our enemies have created conditions that are leading to our genocide. White Americans will become a minority in this country by 2050. A vast number of white Americans are profoundly uncomfortable with this transformation.
Terre et Peuple, Blut und Boden: The notion that every people needs its own land is absolutely essential. The white race must acquire a Homeland of its own, some place on earth where white children can be born and raised in physical and spiritual safety, and where our numbers may be restored and the threat of racial extinction overcome.
“Mightier than the tread of marching armies is the power of an idea whose time has come.” — Victor Hugo
We can’t beat the system now. But I know with absolute metaphysical certainty that the system is going to break down. Nothing lasts forever, especially a society that violates all the laws of nature. I don’t know when the system will fail, but it will almost certainly be within the lifetimes of most of the people reading this. — G.J.
Our entire civilization is under the grip of a new theocracy, the belief that non-discrimination—especially in matters of race, but also in gender and sexual orientation—is the highest value of society: a suicidal ideology. Learn about this theocratic mindset that is taken as axiomatic throughout the West: here.
The goal of Counter-Currents and North American New Right is to create an intellectual movement analogous to the European New Right, a movement that will lay the foundations of a White Republic in North America.
But why if it is too early for politics? Specifically, it is too late to reform the system and too early to replace it. But we can promote our ideas...
At the end of every year, the best of the online journal of Counter-Currents Publishing, Ltd. will be published as a paperback volume.
Conservatives and Liberals vested in the judaeo-economic system are quick to pooh-pooh the idea of secession due to its difficulties and history of failure. What they fail to include in that history are the successes that overcame the difficulties of time and place. Nearly every country on the face of this planet was brought into existence by secession from empire or nation.
Despite years as a mercenary in American service I have learned that the Republic of my ancestors no longer exists. The blinders have gone. The entity calling itself “The United States of America” is not my nation. Those among its citizens who wish to preserve the Beast are not my people. It does not matter that many are “racial kinsmen.” Any man who would force my posterity to suffer the “joy of diversity” to preserve his power, privilege, or comfort is my enemy.
I cannot “lose” what is not mine. I would gladly “lose 95%” of the Beast if my posterity’s existence for the next several centuries could be secured with the remaining 5%. This attitude I hold in common with secessionists from the British Empire, nearly 250 years ago.
“A white nationalist is defined by struggle, by the sacrifices he is willing to make in order to create a more just world. And in this climate, at this time, the pen is the most devastating weapon in our arsenal. For those of us who understand that we’re in the heat of history’s most important battle, we have no choice but to fight (write).” —Martin Penrose
Today the greatest sin is “racism,” and the worst form of racism is “Anti-Semitism.” Most people in the US/Canada or Western Europe today have an almost hysterical religious fanaticism about “racism” being evil.
But the whole concept of racism was unknown 100 years ago.
Cui bono?
It’s clear that the values promoted today benefit one ethnic group above all else. This ethnic group also owns practically all the mainstream media outlets (newspapers and TV networks), the publishing companies, the education establishment, the practice of law, etc.
It is no mystery why this ethnic group promotes a sick morality of white suicide. As Sailer wrote recently, they are motivated by atavistic rage and dread of whites as “The Other.”
(A casual comment in the blogosphere)
Counter-jihadists originally helped me to understand the suicide of the West. I have since moved on from philosemitism to concentrate on the ultimate goal: Euro-white preservation. As Count Clermont-Tonnerre expressed it in addressing the French National Assembly in 1789, “The Jews should be denied everything as a nation, but granted everything as individuals. The existence of a nation within a nation is unacceptable to our country.” Americans and Europeans ought to take heed to what the Count said in 1789. (Cf. these two pieces by Kevin MacDonald: “Introducing The Occidental Observer” and “Remaking the Right”.)
It is an iron biological law that when two distinct subspecies try to occupy the same ecological niche in the same geographical region, there will be group conflict. —Mike Polignano
The Nazis are always discussed in a vacuum. There’s never any mention of the mass murder by Lenin and Stalin and their Jews.
Stalin’s Jews: We mustn’t forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish.
An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name “Genrikh Yagoda,” the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU’s deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin’s collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system. —Desmond Jones
“So foul a sky clears not without a storm.”
11 comments:
If the HA defeat the "immigrant gang" the Black Cobras and their support group the Black Ghosts, then what would happen next? What could happen next?
Interesting questions. Medium to long term, the HA could engage in a war of attrition with similar groups throughout Europe, and the world. (The HA being a global OMG.)
I'm not sure if that's their agenda though. This might just be a local thing.
Mind you, if other "immigrant gangs" do in other territories what the Black Cobras have done in Denmark, and somehow get in the HA's bad books - or if the Black Cobras somehow manage to do what the HA have done, and start up similar groups in different territories - then the possibility of a long-term conflict is there.
We've read how the Denmark HA have a support group (AK81) but this isn't a new idea - Hells Angels have done this for years. It's possible though that more "mainstream" people could sign up for such groups though. This appears to have happened in Denmark, and there's no reason to suppose that, given a similar set of circumstances, it couldn't happen elsewhere.
It's conceivable then, that this conflict could spread out and involve more people, but you raised an interesting question on G of V when you wondered about whether such a conflict could target collaborators.
Very interesting indeed. A key issue, I think. If that line was crossed, then things could become more bitter, and more of a permanent state of affairs.
Hi Kenny,
Thanks for visiting my blog and for supporting me elsewhere.
You can email me anytime.
All the best,
Chechar
I was quite surprised by that other fellow going off the deep end like that. Well, not too surprised given his track record. The original topic seemed to be forgotten fairly quickly. Some of the participants in that thread seemed more interested in showing everyone how clever they were, and putting forward vague, pseudo-intellectual predictions of imminent doom, rather than trying to actually discuss in a meaningful way the one percenters and their current conflict with the "immigrant gangs" in Denmark.
I also found that this whole idea of the Hells Angels being some kind of saviours of civilisation very naive. Those boys are not part of regular society, and to think that they'll somehow come in from outside society - waaay outside - and start running things is a bit of a childish fantasy.
I think some of the people at G of V have read too many of those post-apocalyptic novels that were popular years ago, that whole Jerry Ahern genre, where the Soviet Union kicked off a nuclear war, and the only people left afterwards were gangs of marauding bikers.
I read one or two of those novels as well, years ago. But I understood at the time that they were just make-believe.
Maybe some of those G of V people read Jerry Ahern and let it get to them.
You'll notice too that the Baron & his wife didn't seem too pleased when I pointed out that his predictions of doom and gloom were simply predictions, & nothing more. Apparently his thinking about all matters financial is to be taken as law. This from a guy who can't hold down a job & relies on contributions to run a rinky dink little website! Yeah, right!
There are some huge egos over at G of V. It's a shame because it's a pretty good website usually, and a worthwhile project, in the grand scheme of things.
Oh well, never mind, on to more important - and more interesting - things than discussing G of V second hand.
As I said, it's usually a pretty good website, & it's done well covering the reports of the Hells Angels, but I think that particular story could be covered in a more meaningful way.
I enjoyed a lot your latest posts in the HA thread but missed how the
Baron & his wife didn't seem pleased when you pointed out that about doom. Is it in another thread?
I stick to what I wrote: the future cannot be predicted. The West is in such a bad shape that to make a prophecy in a way that saves the West is an all too understandable human frailty, even if it's no more that a wishful hope.
I believe the substance of the Baron’s essay is not the HA hope, however. It’s what I posted just below this entry.
Cheers,
Chechar.
Don't get me wrong, I rate the G of V quite highly and like the owners, I just got the impression that there were some egos on display in that thread, and in some cases posturing was more important than anything else.
Maybe I read too much into the comments by the owners, but it seemed to me that there was, to some degree at least, an expectation that the owner's views should simply be accepted. We're all guilty of that I suppose, if we put some work into an article and post it on our own website then we can all be a bit prickly when someone comes along and disagrees with what we've said.
I agree that it's very difficult to make accurate predictions, but it is interesting to think about what might happen following this conflict between the Hells Angels and the immigrant gangs.
I'm listening to Jay Dobyns' book about infiltrating the Hells Angels just now. Very interesting. It seems to me that the bikers in Denmark may have released their "jackal manifesto" as a way to "frame" what's happening, and to encourage non-bikers to join AK81. In other words, they had short-term, local aims.
But if other bikers read the "jackal manifesto" and incorporate that kind of thinking into the "group" mentality which already exists, then perhaps what appears to be a Danish conflict could spread throughout the Hells Angels organisation.
It is possible for Hells Angels, wherever they are, to see other biker groups as adversaries. Maybe groups like the Black Cobras could be seen by Hells Angels around the world in the same way.
Maybe that "meme" could spread, if I can put it like that.
Maybe posturing has been more important than anything else in the case of some commenters. I am relatively new to GoV. I like a lot Robert Spencer: he is a great speaker, and he's humble.
By the way, do you know I am publishing a book in GoV? The first chapter has been published today.
too bad about you and ConSwede falling out, it left indeed a bitter aftertaste. Hope it changes yet. I think it is really about too big egos, and cultural misunderstandings probably... I must admit I was mesmerised by his ideas and appreciate your putting the stuff together in easily readable form.
I am also a newbie in the scene and I am very grateful to all of you guys for sharing your ideas. I really learn a lot from you.
Cheers!
Hi Roman,
I am also a newbie: I discovered the subject of Islamization in less than a year! That’s why the collection of these posts are mere summaries. When I become more learned I will write down my *own* ideas in this blog. However, in my latest post I start to talk about my differences with the major figures in the movement, even though I admire them all (except Johnson).
Yes: Con Swede mesmerized me too. I guess his Nietzschean worldview is too advanced for most GoVers (have you read my latest posts there?). In fact, Swede has not been posting in GoV recently. He had phoned me and we talked for hours a few days before… the events summarized above.
Oh, yes: this weekend I am moving out of Spain. No more sunny days in this island of Gran Canaria...
Cheers,
Chechar
Well, there are a few things which Protestant right-wingers feel they have approval to hate, such as the state. Depending on the blend of right-winger, this is very common. But this is not very helpful, since the only thing they manage to achieve is to create an atomized society in concert with the left...
I thought rightists-at least of the Anglo-American variety-were supposed to support civil society against the claims of the state-Burke's "little platoons" and the voluntary associations that Tocqueville spoke of. Civil society has -of course- greatly diminished with the rise of the managerial state, but there is still a remnant mainly in the form of churches. Also most rightist opposition is to the centralized state and they support devolution to the state and local levels of government.
It's funny, but I'm more or less like ConSwede about the future. I believe that if we get our act together(aka a dramatic mind shift) we will solve all our problems. I'm actually excited about this era coming to an end because it's stupid version of good and right make me feel uncomfortable and not at home. They're also inefficient. What depressed me is the present and the slow circling of the drain until that shift will happen. And the idea that we might just surrender is upsetting.
Big mentor Michael O’Meara holds a view similar to Swede’s. How fascinating...
Post a Comment